Response to the September 11, 2001 occasions

With disbelief and shock around the globe individuals noticed the information footage of the occasions on September 11, 2001 when the planes-turned-missiles slammed into the World Commerce Heart towers and into the Pentagon. What might be the worst terrorist assault on america, was completely inexcusable and roundly condemned.

Some 3000 had been killed. Preliminary fears had been that it was over 6000 Plenty of components for this revised quantity, had been mentioned to incorporate preliminary overestimates; multiple particular person reporting the identical lacking particular person; heroic rescue operations, and so forth. This decrease quantity doesn’t in any method cut back the impression although.)

The following bombing of Afghanistan to assault Osama Bin Laden’s Al Qaeda terrorist community and the Taliban for harboring them has additionally led to some 3,500 civilian deaths, based on an impartial examine launched at the start of December 2001.

The ghastly terrorist assaults led to a combination of political, social and financial response around the globe.

Hatred and anti-Islam sentiment, (with out distinguishing the despotic militants from odd Muslims) elevated, though a lot of the Muslim communities around the globe condemned this act.

Whereas seen efforts had been seen by politicians to attempt to separate terrorists from Muslims generally, it has not been simple. On the one hand, after years of financial and geopolitical historical past, there are some features of mistrust, whereas alternatively, extremists within the Muslim and Christian communities are including to the antagonisms. For instance, through the top of the shock and anger to the September 11 assaults, extremist tendencies within the West resulted in beatings and even killings of Muslims. Even non-Muslims that simply occurred to have lengthy beards or in a roundabout way resembled Taliban/Al Qaeda members had been focused. Others noticed this as proof that Islam is inherently violent or that it’s the major risk to the remainder of the world, and so forth. On the Muslim aspect, there have additionally been equally excessive reactions, from assist of those terrorist acts to even being satisfied that this was some form of Zionist conspiracy accountable Muslims! In each circumstances these appear to be a minority of individuals with such excessive views however in fact the priority is all the time that it’ll enhance over time.

There was no query that there was going to be some form of retaliation and response from america. One couldn’t have anticipated them severely to chorus from eager to take revenge. But the worry was in what type this revenge can be and the way it might be carried out in addition to what the impression on odd Afghans can be, who’ve already suffered by the hands of the Taliban and out of doors forces for years.

As well as, some eight months after the assaults it was revealed within the mainstream press around the globe that the CIA had warned George Bush of the threats weeks earlier than September 11. This precipitated an uproar in lots of locations, together with america Congress, the place members demanded extra info to know if all these deaths may have been prevented.

Again to prime

Ensuing Struggle on Terror

The horrible occasions of September 11 noticed the appreciable quieting of what was till then rising home and worldwide criticism of the Bush Administration. The September 11 occasions resulted in a warfare on terror which noticed assist for Bush and his reputation soar on the time.

As much as September 11, 2001, the Bush administration was being criticized around the globe for its stances on numerous points domestically and internationally. Even European and different allies had been very crucial of positions on quite a few international points.

However even earlier than the Bush Administration, all through the world, many countries and teams of individuals had expressed their frustrations at how U.S. international insurance policies had affected them on all types of points, starting from financial/globalization points which have deepened poverty and/or inequality for most individuals around the globe; geopolitics/arms/missile protection; environmental points and so forth. Protests both instantly, or not directly at U.S. insurance policies have occurred all around the globe—particularly on globalization points—as talked about on this web page. (See the part on international protests for extra on that, for instance).

But that can’t be an excuse for the atrocity of September 11 because it killed many harmless individuals. On the similar time, individuals have appropriately identified that when different areas around the globe have confronted related terrorist assaults, the outpouring of concern and condemnation has not been as a lot. The Washington Publish (September 12, 2001) even dared to confess this at such a delicate time shortly after the assaults. (Their article is now not on-line.)

Nevertheless, behind the unity of the American individuals within the shock of September 11, a heightened sense of safety resulted with considerations reverberating all through the world. Many had been involved in regards to the ensuing crackdown of freedoms and civil liberties in numerous nations. Many nervous that numerous international locations around the globe would additionally use this warfare on terror as an excuse to pursue extra aggressive choices on their very own residents.

For instance, think about the considerations Amnesty Worldwide raised in October 2001, shortly after the September 11, 2001 assaults: Within the identify of preventing worldwide terrorism, governments have rushed to introduce draconian new measures that threaten the human rights of their very own residents, immigrants and refugees…. Governments have a duty to make sure the protection of their residents, however measures taken should not undermine basic human rights requirements. It seems that among the initiatives at present being mentioned or applied could also be used to curb fundamental human rights and to suppress inner opposition. Among the definitions of terrorism underneath dialogue are so broad that they might be used to criminalize anybody out of favor with these in energy and criminalize official peaceable train of the fitting to freedom of expression and affiliation. They may additionally put in danger the fitting to privateness and threaten the rights of minorities and asylum-seekers.

In Might 2003, Amnesty Worldwide charged, The warfare on terror, removed from making the world a safer place, has made it extra harmful by curbing human rights, undermining the rule of worldwide regulation and shielding governments from scrutiny. It has deepened divisions amongst individuals of various faiths and origins, sowing the seeds for extra battle. The overwhelming impression of all that is real worry—among the many prosperous in addition to the poor.

Even within the U.S. among the ensuing insurance policies on how suspects will probably be handled, on how entry to private info will probably be made obtainable for safety considerations and so forth, led to debates in any respect ranges on what is taken into account an assault on civil liberties, and what’s affordable for safety. On the international coverage enviornment, there was growing concern that the U.S. would be capable of use the warfare on terror to pursue aggressive insurance policies that had been beforehand criticized by many different individuals. This will vary from financial, to political and even army insurance policies. The Iraq warfare was one such instance, the place amongst different issues, the priority of terrorism was used to justify a warfare towards Iraq, though the terrorism hyperlinks weren’t actual.

Additionally of significance, with its free definition of terror, there’s concern that the warfare on terror , may also have an effect on all these working actually for peace and social justice for all, as even they are going to come underneath scrutiny for maybe appropriately criticizing insurance policies of any variety of nations and organizations around the globe, together with these from the West.

The warfare on terror has in some respects, led to what has been described as a warfare on freedom.

Again to prime

Mainstream Media

Whereas residents in every single place, particularly People, had been rightly outraged on the assaults, the mainstream media has largely targeting the results, the varied aftermaths and impacts, and reporting what political leaders are doing, saying or not doing, or not saying, and so forth. They’ve additionally reported immense element on among the features of the particular bombing in Afghanistan, and so forth. As with most different conflicts in latest historical past although, whereas monumental in amount, media reporting seems comparatively missing in depth, historic context, and investigative evaluation on the causes that gas such outrageous militant extremism and terrorism.

The so-called vary of discourse then, is kind of slim, however inside it, protection is kind of detailed. The reporting of some features is certainly very transferring and superb. There’s, nonetheless, applicable criticism of some extremism creeping into some features of the mainstream media as nicely, in sure circumstances. Importantly although, our vary of views can also be affected by the vary of discourse. That is particularly related now, as residents search solutions on how and why such a horrible atrocity might be dedicated. (For extra on the protection of the media, with evaluation and critique of the mainstream media itself, see this web page’s part: Struggle on Terror Mainstream Media and Propaganda)

Again to prime

Will violence result in extra violence?

With all of the vivid imagery, we are able to solely now start to think about how different individuals and societies around the globe have suffered in different conditions. With typically worse outcomes, albeit not so sudden and stunning, total cities/areas have been leveled and/or monumental quantity of life has been misplaced in locations like Kosovo, Iraq, Democratic Republic of Congo, East Timor, Hiroshima/Nagasaki, throughout Europe through the World Wars, and too many different locations to have the ability to listing right here.

With the US-led bombing marketing campaign on Afghanistan, there has all the time been an increasing number of concern about civilians being caught within the center. Certainly, by early December 2001, some 3,500 Afghan civilians had been believed to have been killed by U.S. bombing. Moreover, many assist companies criticized the meals drops for not delivering a lot precise assist and being a token gesture, somewhat than an efficient one.

Maybe one of many largest fears, voiced earlier than the retaliation began, is that retaliated violence may lead to extra retaliated violence and we danger tit-for-tat violence that appears onerous to get out of. In all this, civilians on all sides will all the time be affected. We solely want remind ourselves of that shuddering speech by Osama Bin Laden on his threats of retaliation towards civilians and of assorted hawkish politicians within the West asking for the equal of no mercy. Martin Luther King is price quoting:

But, how does one get out of this vicious circle? In fact it’s not simple, and even numerous the peace motion battle on this reply, however maybe if extra voice was given within the media to those broader views, then various ideas might be thought of. True, extra on peace-related options are mentioned in TV boards and debates, however relating to the precise reporting and one-on-one dialogue and evaluation, the context is restricted to the present actions and choices. The discussions are due to this fact inside these confines, principally.

On the international coverage entrance, even latest historical past of the final 50 years or so has been questionable by each Western leaders and Center Jap leaders. For instance, the assist by the west of brutal leaders within the center east has contributed to an extremist backlash. Of their battle to get the Soviet Union out of Afghanistan, Osama Bin Laden himself, in addition to different jihadists, had been supported by the US, encouraging the coaching of jihadists and the rise of miltantism to provoke opposition to the communists. Because the article within the earlier hyperlink implies, whereas it appears that evidently the lesser of two evils was supported, maybe the long run penalties weren’t absolutely explored and it does appear that violence and worry breeds extra violence and worry.

Again to prime

President Bush dropping the warfare on terror

Again to prime

Further articles and hyperlinks

On quite a few fronts there are various, many issues occurring which readers have requested me to put in writing on. It’s tough to maintain up with all of the angles with the view to put in writing on all of them. Because of this, for now, till I’m able to catch up, included beneath, underneath this part on the warfare on terrorism are articles reposted from different internet sites and authors from around the globe that supply quite a lot of deeper and wider views and views. They’re broadly categorized into the sections listed beneath, though many articles can simply match different classes too.

Additionally, within the Extra Info web page is a rising assortment of hyperlinks and sources to different internet sites that supply deeper views.

I don’t essentially agree with the entire views of all of the hyperlinks and sources supplied, and under no circumstances are they a complete listing, somewhat an instance.

Among the extra mainstream sources focus way more on the results and aftermaths, whereas among the different sources additionally supply deeper evaluation on causes in addition to ramifications around the globe. These websites have extra hyperlinks which you can comply with to different internet sites. Extra websites will probably be added as time goes on.

Again to prime