Home Wereldnieuws COP20—Lima Local weather Convention — World Points

COP20—Lima Local weather Convention — World Points

admin_wwl
-
0
COP20—Lima Local weather Convention — World Points


Creator and Web page info

  • by Anup Shah
  • This web page Created

On this web page:

  1. Introduction
  2. Assembly end result
  3. Mainstream media reporting
  4. In context: widespread however differentiated tasks
  5. Extra info
  6. Information tales from IPS

Introduction

December 1 – 14, 2014, Lima, Peru was the venue for the twentieth annual United Nations Local weather Change Convention, also referred to as the twentieth Convention of the Events — or COP 20.

The aim of this convention was to create a common settlement on local weather change motion and start the method of financing mitigation.

Again to prime

Assembly end result

The assembly ended with all nations agreeing to chop again greenhouse gasoline emissions. Often called the Lima Accord, this treaty is just not legally binding and international locations wouldn’t have to specify how a lot they are going to reduce, as an alternative agreeing to report their plans again by March 2015.

Whereas for a lot of it seemed like a profitable end result, others have been upset, equivalent to poor international locations struggling to rebuild from present impacts of local weather change who have been alarmed on the disappearance of loss and injury commitments from the ultimate textual content which has been a part of the dialogue for years.

The worldwide local weather motion, 350.org, summarized the disappointments and hopeful features of the assembly end result, noting

  1. The brand new settlement doesn’t mirror the urgency of the local weather disaster
  2. Some good agreements – however no measures to make sure implementation
  3. Least developed and susceptible nations unnoticed within the chilly
  4. Divestment (from fossil gas reliance) is extra necessary than ever
  5. World momentum for actual options is stronger than ever and can carry on going.

In making an attempt to place a constructive spin on the general disappointment they felt, they concluded, In the long run, a world local weather treaty is only one software to fight local weather change. Actual change goes to proceed to return from the grassroots. The UN Local weather Talks proceed to be a spot the place the world’s international locations comes collectively to debate this disaster and persons are placing in monumental efforts to ensure Paris (the subsequent international assembly) gained’t be like Copenhagen which was stuffed with disappointments regardless of huge guarantees.

Samantha Smith, Chief of WWF’s World Local weather and Vitality Initiative, was fairly scathing of the assembly end result saying that political expediency gained over scientific urgency. She additionally famous that Developed nation governments couldn’t even handle to clarify how they are going to ship the long-promised US$100 billion per yr in local weather finance by 2020. In a transfer that seemingly dismissed the plight of essentially the most susceptible international locations, they utterly eliminated any significant language about ‘loss and injury’.

Again to prime

Mainstream media reporting

As with nearly each earlier assembly (with occasional exceptions), mainstream media reporting was very poor given the significance of this international challenge. The place the assembly was reported it was typically in the direction of the tip, and simply sound chunk sort summaries saying all international locations agreed to emission cuts and that this was a serious enchancment.

Whereas the treaty continued to say it honors the long-standing widespread however differentiated tasks the mainstream media reporting (as in most years) has usually failed to supply rationalization and context of this precept that has been an necessary a part of these talks for over 2 many years; that poor and growing international locations shouldn’t bear the identical tasks because the developed ones (as a result of they aren’t the reason for the anthropogenic carbon emissions over the earlier many years which have led to this, which is detailed way more on this website’s web page on local weather justice).

A touch in the direction of this precept could have been offered as a viewpoint of China or India, given the impression they’re being obstacles, moderately then explaining this precept in additional context.

That was simply one of many points skirted over or omitted from widespread reporting. Others included points on financing, know-how assist for poorer nations, and so forth. Behind the scenes, for many years, wealthy international locations have stalled on these items or actively averted making an attempt to share know-how and so forth, which is barely reported.

Yearly, this criticism is fabricated from mainstream reporting, so with out following these negotiations every year, it may be simple to return away with the impression that this assembly had a constructive end result.

However as this dialogue hosted by Democracy Now! reveals, there have been quite a lot of necessary problems with competition:

Emissions-Slicing Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Forestall Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014.

Again to prime

In context: widespread however differentiated tasks

A few years in the past all nations agreed that local weather change was largely the results of actions from as we speak’s industrialized nations, as carbon dioxide — the principle greenhouse gasoline — stays within the environment for many years. But, the poorest would find yourself struggling essentially the most for an issue they largely didn’t trigger. The approaches to mitigation (emissions discount) would due to this fact be totally different for these teams of nations — the widespread however differentiated tasks precept.

It’s on this context that the dialogue for loss and injury has come about. And it’s one thing that wealthy international locations are eager to do away with .

The years of resistance on this challenge (and lots of others) means every time it’s mentioned once more the reactions appear to get much more hostile. Mixed with the shortage of detailed context within the mainstream media protection of this facet, it then turns into simpler every time to see culprits as China and India given their monumental greenhouse emissions in recent times, in comparison with the far larger quantity by the industrialized nations over the longer interval. See this website’s part on local weather justice for extra detailed background.

And as this website has stated for years on the local weather justice web page, the wealthy nations are delaying any significant motion till it’s finally — and disproportionately — paid for the by the growing nations. New Delhi based mostly Nitin Sethi, affiliate editor at Enterprise Customary, interviewed within the earlier talked about video says the identical factor, however extra frankly:

There isn’t any motion that’s going to occur between now and 2020. All of that was to be accomplished by the developed international locations. They (wealthy nations) principally have simply stated at Lima that we’re not going to do any greater than what we’re doing thus far, and the burden can shift onto the post-2020 period, the place different growing international locations need to share it. So, to me, it signifies actually negotiation in unhealthy religion.

Nitin Sethi, Emissions-Slicing Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Forestall Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014

Again to prime

Extra info

Because the convention remains to be underway as this web page is written, extra info will likely be added right here after the occasion is over.

For extra in regards to the points from different organizations, listed here are some beginning factors:

Again to prime

Information tales from IPS

Beneath is a listing of tales from Inter Press Service associated to the Lima local weather convention and its aftermath.

  1. For Africans, the Local weather Debate Across the Position of Livestock Misses the Mark